Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
5A_219/2009 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Interdiction Appeal and Cost Allocation

Geschäftsnummer 5A_219/2009
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves a legal dispute concerning a petition for interdiction, as per the relevant civil code provisions, which was brought forth following a decision by a lower court in Geneva on March 6, 2009. On March 27, 2009, the appellant submitted a reform request that was later treated as a civil appeal. However, the appellant withdrew their appeal on May 4, 2009. Subsequently, the court acknowledged the withdrawal, resulting in the case being removed from its docket, and determined that the appellant would bear the associated judicial costs.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 369 CC, Art. 73 PCF, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, Art. 5 al. 2 PCF, art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF; Withdrawal of Interdiction Appeal and Cost Allocation: On March 27, 2009, the appellant submitted a reform request that was later treated as a civil appeal. However, the appellant withdrew their appeal on May 4, 2009. Subsequently, the court acknowledged the withdrawal, resulting in the case being removed from its docket, and determined that the appellant would bear the associated judicial costs.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Kostenvorschuss Kostenverlegung Abschiebung Zahlungsbefehl zivilrechtliche Entmündigung Widerrufsrecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 369 CC
interdiction ( art. 369 CC ),
Art. 73 PCF
qu'il convient de prendre acte de ce retrait et de rayer la cause du rôle ( art. 73 PCF par renvoi de l' art.
Art. 71 LTF
Used by reference in the reasoning for applying procedural rules (Art. 73 PCF and Art. 5 al. 2 PCF) and costs rules (Art. 66 LTF).
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in the reasoning concerning the removal of the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 5 al. 2 PCF
que les frais doivent être mis à la charge de la recourante ( art. 5 al. 2 PCF par renvoi de l' art.
art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF
Basis for ordering the appellant to pay the judicial costs.
art. 5 al. 2 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF
Cited in the reasoning for allocating the court costs to the appellant.
art. 73 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF
Cited in the reasoning for the removal of the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
KI-generiert
5A_380/2008
Withdrawal of Appeal in Civil Interdiction Case
7B_1198/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal and Allocation of Court Costs
5A_856/2008
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Unpaid Cost Advance in Interdiction Hearing Case
5A_638/2007
Withdrawal of Opposition Removal Appeal and Cost Allocation
4A_346/2017
Appeal Withdrawal and Cost Allocation in Unlawful Act Liability Case

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in the reasoning concerning the removal of the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF

Basis for ordering the appellant to pay the judicial costs.

art. 5 al. 2 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF

Cited in the reasoning for allocating the court costs to the appellant.

art. 73 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF

Cited in the reasoning for the removal of the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 71 LTF

Used by reference in the reasoning for applying procedural rules (Art. 73 PCF and Art. 5 al. 2 PCF) and costs rules (Art. 66 LTF).

art. 72 ss LTF

Reference point for considering the appeal filed as an appeal in civil matters.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

5A_219/2009

Ordonnance du 6 mai 2009

IIe Cour de droit civil

Composition

Mme la Juge Hohl, Présidente.

Greffier: M. Fellay.

Parties

X.________,

représentée par Me Catherine Hekimi, avocate,

recourante,

Objet

interdiction ( art. 369 CC ),

recours contre l'arrêt de la Chambre civile de la Cour de justice du canton de Genève du 6 mars 2009.

Vu:

le recours « en réforme » du 27 mars 2009, traité comme recours en matière civile ( art. 72 ss LTF );

les ordonnances présidentielles des 1er et 29 avril 2009, invitant la recourante à verser une avance de frais de 500 fr. dans les 10 jours;

la déclaration de retrait du recours du 4 mai 2009;

considérant:

qu'il convient de prendre acte de ce retrait et de rayer la cause du rôle ( art. 73 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; art. 32 al. 2 LTF );

que les frais doivent être mis à la charge de la recourante ( art. 5 al. 2 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF );

par ces motifs, la Présidente ordonne:

1. Il est pris acte du retrait du recours et la cause est rayée du rôle.

2. Les frais judiciaires, arrêtés à 300 fr., sont mis à la charge de la recourante.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée à la recourante et à la Chambre civile de la Cour de justice du canton de Genève.

Lausanne, le 6 mai 2009

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit civil

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La Présidente: Le Greffier:

Hohl Fellay