Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
4A_718/2012 KI-generiert

Inadmissibility of Appeal Due to Failure to Post Security for Costs

Geschäftsnummer 4A_718/2012
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

This case involves a legal proceeding in which one party filed a complaint against another in the Swiss Federal Tribunal, following a prior decision made by the Civil Court of Appeal in the canton of Vaud. The focus of the dispute was a failure to provide an advance payment for legal fees. The court previously dismissed a request for legal aid and required the complainant to deposit a specified amount by a certain date to cover potential court costs. However, the complainant did not meet the payment deadline, leading to the court deeming the case inadmissible according to applicable legal provisions. Consequently, no further actions regarding the merits of the case were taken, and the matter of costs was also addressed.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 62 al. 3 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Inadmissibility of Appeal Due to Failure to Post Security for Costs: The focus of the dispute was a failure to provide an advance payment for legal fees. The court previously dismissed a request for legal aid and required the complainant to deposit a specified amount by a certain date to cover potential court costs. However, the complainant did not meet the payment deadline, leading to the court deeming the case inadmissible according to applicable legal provisions. Consequently, no further actions regarding the merits of the case were taken, and the matter of costs was also addressed.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Hinterlegung einer Sicherheitsleistung Sicherheitsleistung unentgeltliche Rechtspflege Gebührenzahlung Beschwerdelegitimation Einrede der Verfassungswidrigkeit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF
This procedural article is implicitly applied when the appeal is declared inadmissible due to non-payment of costs, although it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the decision to declare inadmissibility based on Art. 62 al. 3 LTF is procedural.
Art. 62 al. 3 LTF
The appeal was declared inadmissible because the required advance payment of costs was not provided, as stipulated by this article.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Used to impose judicial costs (émolument judiciaire) on the appellant.
KI-generiert
4A_487/2012
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Failure to Provide Court Cost Security
4A_138/2019
Inadmissibility of Appeal Due to Unpaid Security for Judicial Costs
4A_62/2007
Inadmissibility of Appeal Due to Untimely Payment of Security
4C.95/2007
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Failure to Post Court Cost Security
7B_101/2025
Inadmissibility of Appeal Due to Insufficient Substantiation of Violation of Federal Law Regarding Security for Costs

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

This procedural article is implicitly applied when the appeal is declared inadmissible due to non-payment of costs, although it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the decision to declare inadmissibility based on Art. 62 al. 3 LTF is procedural.

Art. 62 al. 3 LTF

The appeal was declared inadmissible because the required advance payment of costs was not provided, as stipulated by this article.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Used to impose judicial costs (émolument judiciaire) on the appellant.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

4A_718/2012

Arrêt du 27 mai 2013

Ire Cour de droit civil

Composition

Mme la juge fédérale Klett, Présidente de la Cour.

Greffier: M. Thélin.

Participants à la procédure

X.________,

représenté par Me Christian Petermann, avocat,

demandeur et recourant,

contre

Y.________,

représenté par Me Pierre del Boca, avocat,

défendeur et intimé.

Objet

avance de frais non fournie

recours contre l'arrêt rendu le 25 septembre 2012

par la Cour d'appel civile du Tribunal cantonal

du canton de Vaud.

Considérant:

Que par ordonnance du 12 mars 2013, le Tribunal fédéral a rejeté une demande d'assistance judiciaire jointe au recours;

Que le recourant a été invité à verser le montant de 2'000 fr. à titre de sûretés en garantie des frais judiciaires présumés, le délai disponible à cette fin échéant le 15 avril 2013;

Que le 25 de ce mois, un délai supplémentaire échéant le 10 mai 2013 a été communiqué au recourant;

Que le versement n'est pas intervenu;

Que le recours est ainsi irrecevable au regard de l'art. 62 al. 3 de la loi fédérale sur le Tribunal fédéral;

Que l'adverse partie n'a pas été invitée à répondre au recours;

Qu'il ne lui sera donc pas alloué de dépens.

Par ces motifs, le Tribunal fédéral prononce:

1. Le recours est irrecevable.

2. Le recourant acquittera un émolument judiciaire de 1'000 francs.

3. Il n'est pas alloué de dépens.

4. Le présent arrêt est communiqué aux parties et au Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud.

Lausanne, le 27 mai 2013

Au nom de la Ire Cour de droit civil

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La présidente: Klett

Le greffier: Thélin