Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
2C_42/2013 KI-generiert

Death of Appellant Renders Residence Permit Revocation Appeal Moot

Geschäftsnummer 2C_42/2013
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves an individual who filed a public law appeal against a decision made by the administrative court of a canton regarding the revocation of their residence permit. The appeal was submitted after the individual’s residence authorization was annulled, and coincided with a request for legal aid. However, the situation changed due to the individual's death before the appeal could be settled, leading the court to determine that the case was no longer relevant and subsequently dismiss it. The court also approved legal assistance and appointed a defense attorney, along with awarding compensation for their services.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

art. 32 LTF, art. 64 LTF, art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Death of Appellant Renders Residence Permit Revocation Appeal Moot: The appeal was submitted after the individual’s residence authorization was annulled, and coincided with a request for legal aid. However, the situation changed due to the individual's death before the appeal could be settled, leading the court to determine that the case was no longer relevant and subsequently dismiss it. The court also approved legal assistance and appointed a defense attorney, along with awarding compensation for their services.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Widerruf der Aufenthaltsbewilligung Aufenthaltsbewilligung Anwaltskosten Sterbegeld unentgeltliche Rechtspflege unentgeltliche Rechtsverbeiständung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
art. 32 LTF
Used to declare the appeal moot because the underlying issue became without object due to the death of the appellant.
art. 64 LTF
Used to grant the request for legal aid and appoint an official defense counsel.
art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Although costs are not explicitly mentioned in the operative text, article 66 (costs) is often implicitly coupled with Art. 64 (legal aid) or is the basis for the decision not to charge court fees (Art. 4 and 66 LTF govern costs; Art. 64 establishes the procedure when legal aid is granted, which includes the waiver/payment of fees). However, since the text explicitly states in the dispositive 'Il n'est pas perçu de frais de justice' (No court fees are charged), and the reasoning mentions 'art. 64 LTF' which covers legal aid but not explicitly fees, and there is no explicit mention of Art. 66 in the dispositive, I will strictly adhere to the explicit mentions in the numbered orders. The explicit orders cite Art. 32 and Art. 64 in the 'Vu' section, and the operative text orders the waiver of fees (Order 4), but does not cite the legal basis for Order 4 or Order 3 (indemnification) in the operative section itself, only the basis for mootness and legal aid in the preceding 'Vu' section. Based strictly on the explicit citation in the numbered orders (1-5), only Art. 32 and Art. 64 are cited as the legal basis for the procedural steps taken.
KI-generiert
2C_287/2021
Appeal Against Permit Revocation Moot Due to Appellant's Death
2C_495/2012
Petitioner v. Cantonal Tribunal (Residence Permit Revocation)
2F_7/2012
Applicant v. Cantonal Court (Residence Permit Revocation and Expulsion)
2C_1074/2017
Foreign National's Residence Permit Revocation Challenge Dismissed
2C_1047/2022
Citizen v. Cantonal Court on Residence Permit Revocation Appeal Deadline

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 LTF

Used to declare the appeal moot because the underlying issue became without object due to the death of the appellant.

art. 64 LTF

Used to grant the request for legal aid and appoint an official defense counsel.

art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Although costs are not explicitly mentioned in the operative text, article 66 (costs) is often implicitly coupled with Art. 64 (legal aid) or is the basis for the decision not to charge court fees (Art. 4 and 66 LTF govern costs; Art. 64 establishes the procedure when legal aid is granted, which includes the waiver/payment of fees). However, since the text explicitly states in the dispositive 'Il n'est pas perçu de frais de justice' (No court fees are charged), and the reasoning mentions 'art. 64 LTF' which covers legal aid but not explicitly fees, and there is no explicit mention of Art. 66 in the dispositive, I will strictly adhere to the explicit mentions in the numbered orders. The explicit orders cite Art. 32 and Art. 64 in the 'Vu' section, and the operative text orders the waiver of fees (Order 4), but does not cite the legal basis for Order 4 or Order 3 (indemnification) in the operative section itself, only the basis for mootness and legal aid in the preceding 'Vu' section. Based strictly on the explicit citation in the numbered orders (1-5), only Art. 32 and Art. 64 are cited as the legal basis for the procedural steps taken.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

2C_42/2013

Ordonnance du 20 février 2013

IIe Cour de droit public

Composition

M. le Juge fédéral Zünd, Président.

Greffier: M. Dubey.

Participants à la procédure

X.________, représenté par Me Vincent Willemin, avocat,

recourant,

contre

Service des Migrations, Office de la population et des migrations du canton de Berne,

Direction de la police et des affaires militaires du canton de Berne.

Objet

Autorisation de séjour,

recours contre le jugement du Tribunal administratif du canton de Berne, Cour des affaires de langue française, du 22 novembre 2012.

Vu:

le recours en matière de droit public interjeté le 14 janvier 2013 par X.________ contre l'arrêt rendu le 22 novembre 2012 par le Tribunal administratif du canton de Berne confirmant la révocation de son autorisation de séjour,

la demande d'assistance judiciaire du même jour tendant à la désignation d'un défenseur d'office en la personne de Me Vincent Willemin,

le décès de l'intéressé intervenu le 11 février 2013,

les art. 32 et 64 LTF ,

considérant:

qu'il convient de constater que le recours est devenu sans objet et de rayer la cause du rôle,

qu'il convient d'accorder l'assistance judiciaire, de désigner Me Vincent Willemin comme défenseur d'office en procédure devant le Tribunal fédéral, de lui octroyer une indemnité et de ne pas percevoir de frais de justice,

par ces motifs, le Président ordonne:

1. La cause 2C_42/2013, devenue sans objet, est rayée du rôle.

2. La requête d'assistance judiciaire est admise et Me Vincent Willemin désigné défenseur d'office.

3. La Caisse du Tribunal fédéral versera au défenseur d'office une indemnité de 1500 fr.

4. Il n'est pas perçu de frais de justice.

5. La présente ordonnance est communiquée au défenseur d'office, au Service des Migrations, Office de la population et des migrations du canton de Berne, à la Direction de la police et des affaires militaires du canton de Berne, au Tribunal administratif du canton de Berne, Cour des affaires de langue française, et à l'Office fédéral des migrations.

Lausanne, le 20 février 2013

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit public

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Président: Zünd

Le Greffier: Dubey