Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
1C_410/2011 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Public Law Appeal Regarding Driving License Withdrawal

Geschäftsnummer 1C_410/2011
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involved an individual who appealed against the decision to withdraw their driving license for a duration of twelve months, initially pronounced by the relevant cantonal authority. The individual subsequently appealed to the cantonal court, which upheld the withdrawal decision. After further legal proceedings, the individual decided to withdraw their appeal to the Swiss Federal Tribunal, leading to the dismissal of the case without any judicial costs being imposed.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 73 PCF, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, art. 64 LTF, art. 66 al. 1 LTF, art. 66 al. 1, 2ème phrase, LTF; Withdrawal of Public Law Appeal Regarding Driving License Withdrawal: The individual subsequently appealed to the cantonal court, which upheld the withdrawal decision. After further legal proceedings, the individual decided to withdraw their appeal to the Swiss Federal Tribunal, leading to the dismissal of the case without any judicial costs being imposed.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Führerausweisentzug Prozessrecht Rückzug der Klage Strassenverkehrsrecht Wegnahmerecht Einziehung des Motorfahrzeugs

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 73 PCF
Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF as the basis for striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 71 LTF
Cited as the relevant procedural provision governing the striking of the case from the roll due to withdrawal.
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in relation to the procedure for withdrawal of the appeal.
art. 64 LTF
This article is mentioned in the reasoning section regarding lack of applicability for legal aid but is not explicitly cited in operative points 1, 2, or 3.
art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited as the general basis for obligating the appellant (who withdrew) to pay costs, although costs were ultimately waived in this specific instance.
art. 66 al. 1, 2ème phrase, LTF
Cited as the specific basis for rendering the decision without judicial costs due to the circumstances of the withdrawal.
art. 66 al. 2 LTF
Cited regarding the general rule on the imposition of judicial costs following withdrawal.

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
9C_112/2009
Withdrawal of Appeals in Old-Age and Survivors' Insurance Cases; Denial of Legal Aid
KI-generiert
1C_438/2011
Driver Withdraws Appeal Against License Withdrawal
1C_641/2015
Withdrawal of Driving License Appeal Case
1C_497/2019
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Driver's License Withdrawal
1C_86/2018
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Driving License Withdrawal
1C_265/2016
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Driving License Withdrawal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in relation to the procedure for withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 64 LTF

This article is mentioned in the reasoning section regarding lack of applicability for legal aid but is not explicitly cited in operative points 1, 2, or 3.

art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited as the general basis for obligating the appellant (who withdrew) to pay costs, although costs were ultimately waived in this specific instance.

art. 66 al. 1, 2ème phrase, LTF

Cited as the specific basis for rendering the decision without judicial costs due to the circumstances of the withdrawal.

art. 66 al. 2 LTF

Cited regarding the general rule on the imposition of judicial costs following withdrawal.

art. 71 LTF

Cited as the relevant procedural provision governing the striking of the case from the roll due to withdrawal.

art. 73 PCF

Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF as the basis for striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

1C_410/2011

Ordonnance du 4 novembre 2011

Ire Cour de droit public

Composition

M. le Juge Fonjallaz, Président.

Greffier: M. Parmelin.

Participants à la procédure

A.________, représenté par Me Marc-Olivier Buffat, avocat,

recourant,

contre

Service des automobiles et de la navigation du canton de Vaud, avenue du Grey 110, 1014 Lausanne.

Objet

retrait du permis de conduire,

recours contre l'arrêt de la Cour de droit administratif et public du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud du 24 août 2011.

Vu:

l'arrêt de la Cour de droit administratif et public du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud du 24 août 2011 qui rejette le recours formé par A.________ contre la décision sur réclamation rendue le 21 juin 2011 par le Service cantonal des automobiles et de la navigation confirmant le retrait de son permis de conduire prononcé le 27 avril 2011 pour une durée de douze mois,

le recours en matière de droit public formé le 23 septembre 2011 par A.________ contre cet arrêt,

la lettre du 2 novembre 2011 par laquelle l'intéressé déclare retirer son recours;

considérant:

qu'il sied de prendre acte du retrait du recours et de rayer la cause du rôle ( art. 73 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; art. 32 al. 2 LTF ),

que celui qui retire un recours doit, en principe, être considéré comme une partie succombante, astreinte au paiement des frais de justice encourus jusque-là ( art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF ; ordonnance 9C_112/2009 du 6 juillet 2010),

que pour les raisons évoquées par le recourant dans sa déclaration de retrait du recours, la présente ordonnance sera rendue sans frais (art. 66 al. 1, 2ème phrase, LTF);

par ces motifs, le Président ordonne:

1. La cause est rayée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée au mandataire du recourant, ainsi qu'au Service des automobiles et de la navigation et à la Cour de droit administratif et public du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud.

Lausanne, le 4 novembre 2011

Au nom de la Ire Cour de droit public

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Président: Fonjallaz

Le Greffier: Parmelin