Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VKS-E6EB04427FEF706FC22578DF0047211A AI generated

Appeal dismissed due to failure to submit a notarized power of attorney in original or certified copy form.

Case Number VKS-E6EB04427FEF706FC22578DF0047211A
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Bulgaria (BG)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Cassation returned the case to the appellate court because the client failed to submit a notarized power of attorney in original or certified copy form. The document presented at the Pleven District Court was an uncertified copy, which did not meet procedural requirements. Consequently, the appeal was not accepted for review, and the procedural file was sent back to the lower court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 101 of the Code of Civil Procedure: A power of attorney must be submitted in original or certified copy form; failure to comply results in the return of the case to the appellate court.

Keywords

AI generated
power of attorney notarized document certified copy procedural requirement return of case appeal dismissal civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 101 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VKS-6554F7A2E663B91EC22579050049BFEE
Cassation appeal dismissed due to missing original statement, lack of power of attorney, and failure to serve copies.
VKS-170E33B109E8D690C2257D1F0046CEA5
Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to missing power of attorney and incomplete procedural steps.
VKS-581516B1F675E3C9C2257BE8003D9D11
Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to missing original power of attorney required for representation.
VKS-B9EFA67DEA332C97C225790500283DCF
VKS dismisses appeal due to missing original power of attorney; court requires verified copy for validity.
VKS-A9D91917C661D3C8C2257EED0031E0B3
Private appeal dismissed due to lack of notarized power of attorney for legal representation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Р А З П О Р Е Ж Д А Н Е

№ 362

С., 03.08.2011 г.

МАРИО БОБАТИНОВ, Председател на Търговска колегия на Върховния касационен съд на Република България, като разгледа преписка вх. № 11 525/22.07.2011 г., констатира следното:

Преписката е образувана във Върховния касационен съд по повод изпратена от Софийски апелативен съд касационна жалба от [фирма], [населено място] против решение № 652 от 18.04.2011 г. по в.гр./т. д. № 519/2010 г. на САС.

В конкретния случай следва да се представи пълномощно на адв. С. П. в оригинал или заверено копие, тъй като представеното пред Плевенски окръжен съд – л. 18, пълномощно е незаверено копие.

По горните съображения, Председателят на ТК на ВКС

Р А З П О Р Е Д И :

ВРЪЩА преписка с вх. № 11 525/22.07.2011 г. на Апелативен съд [населено място].

Председател на ТК, ВКС: ___________

п.ч.