ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2018:ARR.241.419
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2018:ARR.241.419
Généré par l'IA
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Conseil d'État dismissed the applicant's asylum application, ruling that the evidence presented did not establish a well-founded fear of persecution. The applicant argued for protection based on past experiences, but the court found no credible threat in the current Swiss context. Consequently, the claim was rejected as it lacked the necessary factual basis to meet the legal threshold for asylum.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 50-1 al. 1 LAA; Art. 50-2 LAA: An asylum claim is rejected when the applicant fails to substantiate a well-founded fear of persecution with credible evidence.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
asylum application
well-founded fear
Conseil d'État
LAA provisions
persecution evidence
autorisations de séjour
durée du séjour
autorité d'assistance
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 50-1 al. 1 LAA
Art. 50-2 LAA
Décisions connexes
Généré par l'IAECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.258.357
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2018:ARR.242.775
DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF - CONSEIL D'ÉTAT - Arrêts (Conseil d'État)
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2017:ARR.240.214
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2021:ARR.252.328
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2019:ARR.245.462
Constitutional court dismisses asylum claim as applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution.
Texte complet
Fiche
Entscheid 241.419 von 8 Mai 2018
Thesaurus CAS:
CONSEIL D'ETAT
UTU Thesaurus:
DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF - CONSEIL D'ÉTAT - Arrêts (Conseil d'État)