ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2018:ARR.240.516
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2018:ARR.240.516
Généré par l'IA
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Conseil d'État dismissed the applicant's asylum request, ruling that the evidence presented did not establish a well-founded fear of persecution. The applicant argued for protection based on past experiences, but the court found no credible threat in the current Swiss context. Consequently, the application was rejected as it lacked the necessary legal basis for granting asylum under Swiss law.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 100a CO; Art. 100b CO: An asylum claim is rejected when the applicant fails to substantiate a well-founded fear of persecution or serious harm in the host country.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
asylum claim
well-founded fear
Conseil d'État
protection status
persecution evidence
absence prolongée du pays
risque de séjour illégal
autorisations de séjour
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAECLI:BE:RVSCE:2022:ARR.253.511
Constitutional complaint dismissed; administrative act upheld as lawful under Swiss Federal Constitution.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2022:ARR.253.771
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR.255.989
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2017:ARR.240.202
Belgian Council of State annuls royal order for refusing military training reimbursement due to insufficient administrative motivation.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2017:ARR.240.335
Constitutional court annuls royal order refusing military officer exemption from training fee reimbursement.
Texte complet
Fiche
Entscheid 240.516 von 23 Januar 2018
Thesaurus CAS:
CONSEIL D'ETAT
UTU Thesaurus:
DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF - CONSEIL D'ÉTAT - Arrêts (Conseil d'État)