Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ECLI:BE:AHGNT:2018:ARR.20180409.2 ECLI:BE:AHGNT:2018:ARR.20180409.2 Généré par l'IA

Unpaid benefit claim by employer rejected; employer cannot recover from unemployed person absent of fault.

Numéro de cause ECLI:BE:AHGNT:2018:ARR.20180409.2
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Belgique (BE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the employer's claim to recover unpaid unemployment benefits from the unemployed person. The employer argued that the unemployment office's verification procedure incorrectly rejected a payment, yet the employee had no fault in the error. The court ruled that the employer bears the risk of the administrative verification process and cannot shift liability to the innocent employee.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 17, § 1, 2, 3 RVA; Art. 17, § 4, 1, 2, 3 RVA: If the RVA rejects a payment during verification, the paying institution cannot claim recovery from the unemployed person who committed no fault, even if they were not entitled to the payment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
unemployment benefits verification procedure reimbursement claim employer liability faultless error RVA decision payment institution restitution des indemnités de chômage

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 17, § 1, 2, 3 RVA
Art. 17, § 4, 1, 2, 3 RVA
Généré par l'IA
ECLI:BE:CTLIE:2018:ARR.20180606.7
Court rejects unemployment agency's cost recovery, ruling Royal Decree discriminatory under Social Security Charter.
ECLI:BE:ARGNT:2025:JUG.20251008.1
Court dismisses claim for return of unemployment benefits due to lack of fault and unequal treatment under social security law.
ECLI:BE:CASS:2019:ARR.20190520.1
Belgian court dismisses appeal regarding unemployment benefit recovery and procedural fairness arguments.
ECLI:BE:CTLIE:2021:ARR.20210319.6
Appeal dismissed as late due to appeal period starting from judicial mail delivery to the recipient's domicile.
ECLI:BE:CTLIE:2024:ARR.20240624.1
Court orders reopening of debate on appeal admissibility due to public order rules and lack of contradictory discussion.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Fiche

Indien de RVA in het kader van de verificatieprocedure een uitgave van

uitbetalingsinstelling verwerpt, dan kan deze uitbetalingsinstelling de

uitgave niet verhalen op de werkloze die geen fout heeft begaan, ook niet

indien de werkloze eigenlijk geen recht had op de uitgave.

UTU-thesaurus:

SOCIAAL RECHT - SOCIALE ZEKERHEID - Werkloosheid - Procedure - Beslissing

SOCIAAL RECHT - SOCIALE ZEKERHEID - Werkloosheid - Procedure - Uitbetaling

Vrije woorden:

UITBETALINGSINSTELLING - AANSPRAKELIJKHEID - TERUGVORDERING - VERIFICATIEBESLISSING

RVA