Failure to cure procedural defects within court-ordered deadline triggers dismissal of administrative complaint

The Administrative Court dismissed the proceedings due to the failure of the appellant to cure procedural defects, effectively leaving the underlying administrative decision in force. The dispute concerned an administrative review of a prior decision, where the court had issued an interim order on March 25, 1992, requiring the appellant to remedy specific deficiencies in their complaint within a six-week deadline. Because the appellant failed to comply with this directive to cure the defects, the court determined that the legal requirements for continuing the proceedings were not met, resulting in the termination of the case without a substantive review of the merits. The decisive legal basis was the procedural requirement for a valid complaint to be complete and defect-free, which, when not cured within the stipulated timeframe after a formal demand, leads to the dismissal or termination of the administrative court proceedings.