Constitutional complaint review jurisdiction and admissibility criteria under Article 144 B-VG

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as inadmissible for lack of procedural standing, leaving the challenged lower-court judgment and the underlying administrative decision in force against the complainant. The dispute concerned a challenge to a final administrative ruling regarding [specific subject matter, e.g., tax assessment or building permit], where the complainant argued that the administrative court had violated fundamental constitutional rights or failed to properly evaluate the evidence. The decisive legal basis was Article 144 of the Federal Constitutional Law (Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, B-VG), which restricts the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court to review individual legal acts only in cases where the applicant directly claims the violation of a fundamental right protected by the Constitution, rendering the complaint non-exhaustive or procedurally defective under the specific statutory provisions governing constitutional review of administrative acts.