Constitutional review of statutory provision validity under Austrian federal constitutional law
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Austrian Constitutional Court (VfGH) in Case B363/76 rendered a decision on December 1, 1978, the specific operative outcome of which is not detailed in the available metadata but is referenced in the full PDF text of the official collection (Sammlungsnummer 8440); as the full text is only available as a PDF without OCR or machine-readable content, the precise ruling (e.g., whether the challenged norm was declared unconstitutional or the complaint dismissed) and the prevailing party cannot be definitively identified from the provided record. The case falls under the jurisdiction of the VfGH, indicating a constitutional complaint or abstract review regarding the validity of a statutory provision or administrative act, but the specific subject matter and material facts remain unknown due to the lack of textual data. Consequently, the decisive legal basis—whether rooted in specific articles of the Federal Constitutional Law (B-VG) or fundamental rights guarantees—cannot be determined for filtering purposes from this metadata-only entry.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG: The Constitutional Court exercises jurisdiction to review the constitutionality of laws and acts of state organs, but its review is limited to specific grounds and procedural requirements.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVolltext
Siehe PDF-Dokument
Siehe PDF Dokument