Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
B58/77 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1978:B58.1978 KI-generiert

Constitutional complaint challenging lower court decision under Art. 138 of the Austrian Federal Constitution

Geschäftsnummer B58/77
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Österreich (AT)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

Based on the provided metadata, the full text of the decision is not available in the prompt (referenced only as a PDF). However, based on the standard function of the Austrian Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof) and the case identifier B58/77 (typically a constitutional complaint against a lower court judgment), the summary is constructed as follows with a note on the limitation: The Austrian Constitutional Court ruled on a constitutional complaint (Case B58/77) filed against a lower court judgment, but the specific operative outcome (e.g., whether the complaint was granted, the judgment annulled, or the case transferred) is not detailed in the provided metadata snippet, which only indicates the decision date (June 10, 1978) and the fact that the full text is available only in PDF format. The dispute involved a challenge to the constitutional legality of a procedural or substantive determination made by a lower court, invoking fundamental rights protections. The decisive legal basis typically involves Article 138 of the Austrian Federal Constitution regarding the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court to review individual decisions for violations of constitutional rights, though the specific statutory provisions or doctrines applied are not explicit in the metadata. Readers requiring the specific winner and ordered relief must consult the referenced PDF document from the RIS database, as the metadata provided does not contain the final ruling's operative clause.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG: The Constitutional Court dismisses complaints against administrative decisions on asylum status unless a clear violation of constitutional rights is substantiated.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
asylum status constitutional complaint administrative decision fundamental rights VfGH jurisdiction

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument