Constitutional complaint challenging judicial decision; absence of sufficient nexus to fundamental rights

The Constitutional Court dismissed the complaint, leaving the lower instance decision in force as no substantive constitutional violation was established. The dispute concerned a challenge to a judicial decision regarding administrative or procedural matters, where the petitioner argued that their fundamental rights had been infringed by the trial court's handling of the case. The decisive legal basis was the Constitution (B-VG), specifically the provisions guaranteeing the right to a fair hearing and effective legal remedy, which the Court found were not violated or where the petitioner failed to demonstrate a sufficient nexus to constitutional protection, resulting in the rejection of the constitutional review.