Constitutional complaint challenging social insurance benefit refusal for lack of prima facie constitutional rights violation

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as inadmissible. The dispute concerned a challenge to the legality of a decision in a social insurance proceeding, specifically involving the refusal of benefits or benefits calculation by the insurance carrier. The complainant alleged that the administrative authorities violated fundamental constitutional rights by failing to properly assess the facts and apply the relevant social security statutes. The Court found that the complaint did not establish a prima facie violation of individual rights protected by the Constitution and that the matter fell within the scope of ordinary judicial review rather than requiring constitutional intervention, leaving the contested administrative decision in force.