Constitutional complaint challenging municipal bylaws: admissibility requirement for review of individual administrative decisions versus general norms

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as inadmissible, leaving the challenged municipal bylaws and the subsequent administrative decision in force. The dispute concerned a challenge to the legality and constitutionality of local regulations regarding public order or administrative matters, where the complainant argued that the local authority's acts violated constitutional rights. The decisive legal basis was the requirement that a constitutional complaint under Article 144 of the Federal Constitutional Law must be directed against an individual administrative decision or court judgment, not merely against general legal norms or bylaws, unless specific conditions for direct review are met; the court found the complaint did not satisfy the procedural prerequisites for admissibility, thereby upholding the prior administrative findings.