Constitutional complaint against administrative decision; lack of constitutional violation and procedural admissibility

**Case Outcome and Summary** The Austrian Constitutional Court (VfGH) dismissed the constitutional complaint, finding that the complained-about administrative decision did not violate the complainant's fundamental rights or that the requisite legal violations were not established, thereby upholding the lower administrative authority's ruling. The dispute concerned a specific administrative law matter, where the complainant challenged the legality and constitutionality of a prior administrative act, asserting that it infringed upon their rights. The court's decision rests on the fundamental legal principles of Austrian administrative procedure and the specific constitutional standards governing judicial review of administrative decisions, confirming that the impugned measure complied with the applicable statutory provisions and did not exhibit the requisite constitutional defects to warrant annulment.