Constitutional court dismissed complaint regarding invalidity of administrative act under Art. 138a and Art. 138b of the Constitution.

The Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint challenging the validity of an administrative act based on alleged violations of Articles 138a and 138b of the Constitution. The applicant argued that the specific administrative measure infringed upon protected rights, while the state contended the act complied with constitutional requirements. The court found no sufficient evidence of a constitutional violation to warrant the annulment of the administrative decision.