Constitutional review of civil servant disciplinary proceedings for rights violations

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as inadmissible, leaving the impugned administrative decision in force. The dispute concerned a challenge to a lower administrative authority’s decision regarding the assessment of public service duties, specifically alleging a violation of fundamental rights through procedural errors in the disciplinary proceedings against a civil servant. The Court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the complained-about provision or procedure was unconstitutional or that the specific application of the law to the individual case violated rights protected by the Constitution, as the error claimed was a mere factual or procedural misapplication rather than a structural constitutional defect.