Constitutionality of differential treatment in housing financial assistance under the principle of equality before the law

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as unfounded, thereby upholding the statutory provision challenged by the complainant. The dispute concerned a complaint against the constitutionality of a specific norm within the law governing financial assistance for housing, where the complainant argued that the legislative regulation violated the fundamental rights to equality before the law and property. The Court held that the impugned provision was not in conflict with the Federal Constitution, specifically rejecting the argument that the differential treatment of beneficiaries constituted an arbitrary or unjustified breach of the constitutional right to equal treatment under Article 7 of the Federal Constitutional Law, as the legislative classification was deemed rationally grounded in the pursuit of a legitimate social policy objective.