Constitutional complaint against administrative court procedural ruling; nexus between procedural defect and individual rights infringement

The Constitutional Court dismissed the petition as unfounded, thereby leaving the challenged lower court decision in force. The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint challenging a procedural ruling issued by the Supreme Administrative Court, which the complainant argued violated fundamental rights by failing to adjudicate the substantive merits of a matter within its jurisdiction. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the interpretation of the Competence Act and the relevant procedural code provisions, which established that the complainant had failed to demonstrate a sufficient nexus between the procedural defect alleged and a specific infringement of individual constitutional rights, or that the remedy sought was not available through the ordinary administrative court channels.