Constitutional complaint against judicial decision; outcome and legal grounds unavailable due to restricted full-text access
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Austrian Constitutional Court (VfGH) issued a decision in case B260/72 on February 23, 1973, but the specific operative outcome, such as whether the petition was granted or dismissed, is not available in the provided metadata as the full text is restricted to a referenced PDF document. The case involves a constitutional review procedure, likely concerning a complaint against a judicial or administrative act, given the nature of the VfGH’s jurisdiction and the case numbering convention. However, without access to the substantive text, the material facts, the specific legal norms challenged, and the decisive legal doctrines applied remain unidentified. Consequently, it is not possible to determine which party prevailed or the precise legal basis for the ruling based solely on the available record.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG: A complaint for the annulment of an administrative act is inadmissible if the act is based on a valid statutory provision, even if the applicant disputes the interpretation or application of that law.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVolltext
Siehe PDF-Dokument
Siehe PDF Dokument