Constitutional court dismisses appeal regarding the validity of a law on the protection of the state against subversion. The court ruled the law unconstitutional due to violation of fundamental rights. The decision upholds the principle of proportionality in state security measures.

The Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's appeal challenging the constitutionality of the law on the protection of the state against subversion. The applicant argued that the broad powers granted to authorities violated fundamental rights without sufficient safeguards. The court held that the measures were necessary and proportionate to protect the state's existence against existential threats.