Constitutional court dismissed complaint regarding invalidity of administrative act under Art. 138a and Art. 138b of the Constitution.

The Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint challenging the validity of an administrative act based on alleged violations of specific constitutional articles. The applicant argued that the act infringed upon fundamental rights protected by the cited provisions, while the state contended the measure was lawful and necessary. The court rejected these claims, finding no sufficient evidence to establish a constitutional violation in the specific circumstances presented.