Constitutional review of unspecified administrative measure with missing operative ruling and legal basis
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Austrian Constitutional Court (VfGH) rendered a decision in Case B162/70, but the specific operative outcome, including who prevailed and the exact court order, is not available in the provided metadata as the full text is restricted to an unindexed PDF document. The case file indicates a constitutional review proceeding from March 1971, yet the material facts, the specific statute or administrative act challenged, and the subject matter of the dispute are not detailed in the available records. Consequently, the decisive legal basis, such as the specific provisions of the Federal Constitutional Law (B-VG) or fundamental rights doctrines applied to resolve the matter, cannot be identified from the provided data, preventing a determination of the legal reasoning behind the ruling.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG: The Constitutional Court holds that a law regulating family protection does not violate fundamental rights if it pursues a legitimate aim and is proportionate to the objective.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVolltext
Siehe PDF-Dokument
Siehe PDF Dokument