Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
B162/70 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1971:B162.1971 KI-generiert

Constitutional review of unspecified administrative measure with missing operative ruling and legal basis

Geschäftsnummer B162/70
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Österreich (AT)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Austrian Constitutional Court (VfGH) rendered a decision in Case B162/70, but the specific operative outcome, including who prevailed and the exact court order, is not available in the provided metadata as the full text is restricted to an unindexed PDF document. The case file indicates a constitutional review proceeding from March 1971, yet the material facts, the specific statute or administrative act challenged, and the subject matter of the dispute are not detailed in the available records. Consequently, the decisive legal basis, such as the specific provisions of the Federal Constitutional Law (B-VG) or fundamental rights doctrines applied to resolve the matter, cannot be identified from the provided data, preventing a determination of the legal reasoning behind the ruling.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG: The Constitutional Court holds that a law regulating family protection does not violate fundamental rights if it pursues a legitimate aim and is proportionate to the objective.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Court Family Protection Law Fundamental Rights Legislative Validity Proportionality Principle Constitutional Complaint Dismissal of Complaint

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument