Constitutional complaint against administrative decision: admissibility of extraordinary constitutional review and scope of jurisdiction

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as inadmissible, leaving the challenged administrative measure in force. The dispute concerned a challenge to an administrative decision regarding public service or employment matters, where the complainant argued that the lower administrative court had violated their fundamental rights. The Court’s decisive legal basis was its lack of jurisdiction to review the matter, likely because the constitutional complaint was not properly directed against a final decision of the administrative court or did not meet the specific procedural requirements for a constitutional review, thereby rejecting the petition without a substantive examination of the merits.