Exclusion of fact and general legal interpretation review absent manifest fundamental rights violation

The constitutional complaint was denied. The case involved a challenge to a decision by the Administrative Court of Austria, which had previously dismissed an appeal against a specific administrative act. The complainant argued that the Administrative Court's decision violated their fundamental rights, specifically alleging that the lower administrative authorities had erred in their legal assessment and application of the relevant substantive laws. The Constitutional Court found that the arguments raised were not of such a nature as to justify setting aside the decision of the prior instance, upholding the administrative determination. The decisive legal basis for the denial was the constitutional doctrine that the Constitutional Court does not review matters of fact or the general correctness of legal interpretations by lower courts unless a specific fundamental right has been manifestly violated, which was not established here.