Constitutional complaint against an administrative determination, dismissed for lack of demonstrated fundamental rights violation

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint, thereby upholding the challenged administrative decision in favor of the state authorities. The dispute concerned a challenge against a final administrative resolution, where the complainant alleged violations of fundamental rights due to procedural defects or substantive illegality in the lower authorities' handling of the matter. In its decision, the Court found that the administrative bodies had acted within their legal discretion and that no violation of the complainant's constitutional rights occurred, applying the standard doctrines of constitutional review to reject the allegations of illegality and affirming the validity of the prior administrative acts.