Constitutional court dismissed complaint regarding invalidity of law on state compensation for war damages.

The Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint challenging the validity of the law governing state compensation for war damages. The applicant argued that the statutory framework failed to adequately cover specific categories of war-related losses suffered during the conflict. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the existing legislation sufficiently addressed the scope of compensable damages and that the applicant's interpretation was not supported by the text or legislative intent.