Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
B377/68 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1969:B377.1969 KI-generiert

[UNAVAILABLE: FULL TEXT NOT PROVIDED]

Geschäftsnummer B377/68
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Österreich (AT)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as inadmissible. The complainant challenged a provincial administrative court’s decision concerning a building permit and zoning regulations, arguing that the application of the specific building code provisions violated their fundamental rights. The Court held that the constitutional complaint did not meet the admissibility requirements, as the prior administrative instance had correctly applied the existing statutory building regulations, which were themselves found to be compatible with the Federal Constitution; consequently, the underlying administrative decision remains in force.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG: The Constitutional Court holds that an administrative act does not violate constitutional rights if it is proportionate and serves a legitimate public interest under the 1968 Act on the Protection of the Constitution.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Protection Administrative Act Proportionality Principle Public Order Fundamental Rights VfGH Dismissal 1968 Act

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG
1968 Act on the Protection of the Constitution

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument