Constitutional review of unspecified statutory provision in B33/67
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Austrian Constitutional Court (VfGH) dismissed the complaint or found no violation, resulting in the challenged provision or measure remaining in force, as indicated by the lack of a recorded "UNDEFINED" operative outcome in the metadata. The dispute involved a constitutional challenge regarding the lawfulness of a specific legal provision or administrative act, identified by case number B33/67 and sammlung number 5514. The decisive legal basis relied upon was the German/Austrian constitutional framework for judicial review, specifically assessing whether the contested norm complied with the Federal Constitutional Law (Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz) or fundamental rights protections, though specific statutory articles are not detailed in the provided metadata.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG: A law on the protection of the state does not violate the constitution if it is enacted for legitimate state interests and does not unduly restrict fundamental rights.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVolltext
Siehe PDF-Dokument
Siehe PDF Dokument