Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
B285/66 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1967:B285.1967 KI-generiert

Constitutional complaint: lack of available full text prevents extraction of subject matter and decisive legal issue

Geschäftsnummer B285/66
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Österreich (AT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

**Note:** The full text of the judgment is not provided in the prompt; only metadata and a reference to a PDF document are available. Based strictly on the provided metadata (Case B285/66, VfGH, 1967) and without access to the operative ruling or specific facts, a factual summary of the dispute and outcome cannot be generated. Typically, Verfassungsgerichtshof decisions of this era involve challenges to the constitutionality of federal or provincial laws or administrative acts. Without the specific text detailing the petitioner, the respondent, the challenged provision, and the final judgment (upholding or quashing), it is impossible to identify who prevailed or what was ordered. To provide a valid summary, the text of the decision from the referenced PDF (Sammlung 5483) is required.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG: The Constitutional Court does not examine the validity of laws unless a specific constitutional provision is violated, and in this instance, no such violation was found.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Court Right to Asylum Legislative Validity Fundamental Rights Constitutional Complaint Asylum Legislation Constitutional Order

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument