B204/66
ECLI:AT:VFGH:1966:B204.1966
KI-generiert
Constitutional court dismisses appeal regarding invalidity of law due to lack of legislative intent to regulate the specific matter.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's appeal challenging the constitutionality of the relevant law. The applicant argued that the legislation failed to address a specific legal gap, yet the court found no such omission. Consequently, the court ruled that the law was valid because the legislature did not intend to regulate the disputed issue.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG: A law is not unconstitutional merely because it does not regulate a specific matter if the legislature had no intent to do so.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
constitutional invalidity
legislative intent
omission of regulation
constitutional review
statutory interpretation
VfGH decision
legal gap
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG
Volltext
Siehe PDF-Dokument
Siehe PDF Dokument