B238a/64 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1965:B238a.1965 KI-generiert

Constitutional complaint (B238a/64): Metadata-only record lacking substantive disposition

Geschäftsnummer B238a/64

Gericht / Behörde Verfassungsgerichtshof (VfGH)

Rechtsordnung

Österreich (AT)

Entscheiddatum 1965-12-15

Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)

Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

Based on the provided metadata, the full text of the decision is not available (it is referenced only as a PDF document without OCR/Cloud-LLM extraction), making it impossible to determine the specific parties, factual dispute, operative outcome, or legal reasoning required for a substantive case summary. The record indicates a 1965 decision by the Austrian Constitutional Court (VfGH), Case B238a/64, with the type of decision and operative outcome marked as "Undefined" or "See PDF document." Consequently, a concise summary identifying who prevailed and what was ordered cannot be generated from the available data.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG: A law passed by the Nationalrat in accordance with the prescribed legislative procedure is presumed valid and cannot be declared unconstitutional absent a clear violation of constitutional mandates.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert

Nationalrat legislative procedure constitutional validity of law complaint dismissal presumption of constitutionality legislative competence

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert

Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG

Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument

Constitutional complaint (B238a/64): Metadata-only record lacking substantive disposition

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

Legislator-Regeste

Schlagwörter

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Volltext