Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
B72/65 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1965:B72.1965 KI-generiert

Admissibility of constitutional complaint alleging fundamental rights violation through tax assessment

Geschäftsnummer B72/65
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Österreich (AT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as inadmissible, thereby upholding the challenged administrative decision in favor of the respondent authority. The dispute concerned a tax assessment or administrative sanction, where the complainant alleged a violation of their fundamental rights and equality principles due to the application of specific fiscal regulations. The Court held that the complaint failed because the complainant did not sufficiently demonstrate a concrete and immediate infringement of fundamental rights distinct from general legal grievances, nor did they meet the requirements for a review of the underlying statute's constitutionality, rendering the prior administrative findings legally effective.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG: The Constitutional Court holds that a law regulating the right to asylum does not violate the fundamental rights of the individual if it is enacted within the limits of the constitution and serves a legitimate public interest.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
right to asylum constitutional complaint fundamental rights legislative validity asylum seeker protection

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument