Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
B220/65 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1965:B220.1965 KI-generiert

Constitutional complaint against administrative act: review of admissibility and fundamental rights infringement under Austrian constitutional law

Geschäftsnummer B220/65
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Österreich (AT)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Austrian Constitutional Court dismissed the complaint as inadmissible, resulting in no change to the legal status quo. The case involved a constitutional complaint challenging an administrative act or legal provision, likely pertaining to tax or administrative law given the court's typical subject matter in this period, where the petitioner argued that the act violated fundamental rights. The Court's decision relied on procedural admissibility requirements or substantive constitutional review standards under the Austrian Federal Constitutional Act, determining that the complaint did not meet the necessary legal thresholds for further adjudication or that the challenged measure did not infringe upon the petitioner's protected rights.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to review the substantive legality of administrative decisions on naturalization unless a specific constitutional violation is clearly established.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
naturalization decision constitutional complaint administrative legality VfGH jurisdiction citizenship rights

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument