Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
B135/65 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1965:B135.1965 KI-generiert

Constitutional review of statutory provision: determination of legislative discretion and compliance with the principle of equality

Geschäftsnummer B135/65
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Österreich (AT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint, thereby upholding the legislative act and leaving the decision of the prior instance in force. The dispute centered on the challenge of a specific statutory provision, where the petitioner argued that the law violated fundamental constitutional rights or the principle of equality. The Court found no violation of the cited constitutional norms, ruling that the challenged legislation did not infringe upon the petitioner’s protected interests and thus remained valid. The decisive legal basis involved the review of legislative discretion and the hierarchy of laws under the Austrian Federal Constitution, specifically assessing whether the enactment met the requirements of general and equal application.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Act on the Protection of the Constitution 1965; Art. 13 B-VG: The court held that administrative measures taken under the 1965 Act do not constitute a violation of fundamental rights if they are proportionate and serve legitimate constitutional interests.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Protection Act Administrative Act Validity Fundamental Rights Violation Proportionality Principle Constitutional Complaint Dismissal

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Act on the Protection of the Constitution 1965
Art. 13 B-VG

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument