Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
V2/65 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1965:V2.1965 KI-generiert

Constitutional review of administrative ruling: application of substantive statutory norms and procedural requirements

Geschäftsnummer V2/65
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Österreich (AT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court (VfGH) ruled that the challenged administrative act was in violation of the law, thereby granting the constitutional complaint and annulling the decision. The dispute concerned a challenge to an administrative authority's resolution, where the complainant argued that the lower body had erred in the application of substantive legal norms and procedural requirements. The Court's decisive legal basis was the violation of Article 18 of the Austrian Federal Constitutional Law (B-VG), which guarantees the right to petition for the annulment of administrative decisions if they are unlawful, establishing that the administrative tribunal had failed to adequately consider the relevant statutory provisions applicable to the specific subject matter.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG: The Constitutional Court dismisses complaints against laws on the protection of the state if the plaintiff fails to demonstrate a concrete violation of fundamental rights or a lack of legal basis.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Court Protection of the State Fundamental Rights Legislative Validity Constitutional Complaint State Security Legal Basis

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument