B278/64
ECLI:AT:VFGH:1965:B278.1965
KI-generiert
Constitutional court dismisses complaint regarding the validity of a law on the right to asylum.
Österreich (AT)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Constitutional Court dismissed the plaintiff's complaint challenging the constitutionality of the law on the right to asylum. The plaintiff argued that the legislation violated fundamental rights, but the court found no such violation in the text or application of the law. Consequently, the challenge to the statute's validity was rejected without further examination.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG: The Constitutional Court holds that a law regulating the right to asylum does not violate the fundamental rights of the individual if it is enacted within the limits of the constitution and pursues a legitimate public interest.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
right to asylum
constitutional complaint
fundamental rights
legislative validity
asylum seeker protection
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG
Volltext
Siehe PDF-Dokument
Siehe PDF Dokument