Constitutional review of unspecified administrative decision; specific subject matter and legal issue obscured by unavailable full text
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Austrian Constitutional Court (VfGH) rendered a decision in Case B89/64 on March 13, 1965, but the specific operative outcome, including whether the petition was granted or dismissed, is not available in the provided metadata as the full text is referenced only as a PDF document without accessible OCR data. Consequently, the precise identity of the prevailing party and the final ordered remedy cannot be determined from the available records. The case involved a constitutional complaint or review of a legal norm, identified by the case number B89/64 and the court's jurisdiction, but the subject matter and material facts regarding the specific right or law challenged are absent. The decisive legal basis, typically involving the Austrian Federal Constitutional Law (B-VG), is not specified in the metadata. Readers requiring the definitive outcome, procedural details, and applicable legal norms must consult the full PDF document referenced in the RIS database under the identifier JFT_19650313_64B00089_00.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: A residence permit for foreigners is granted for a specific period and must be renewed before its expiration; an indefinite extension is not permitted without new statutory grounds.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVolltext
Siehe PDF-Dokument
Siehe PDF Dokument