Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
B169/64 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1964:B169.1964 KI-generiert

Constitutional review outcome unavailable: full text missing (PDF-only reference); operative order and decisive legal issue indeterminable

Geschäftsnummer B169/64
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Österreich (AT)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Austrian Constitutional Court (VfGH) issued a decision in Case B169/64, but the specific operative outcome, prevailing party, and legal reasoning are not available in the provided metadata as the full text is restricted to a PDF document that was not processed for analysis. Consequently, it is impossible to determine who prevailed, what the court specifically ordered, or the status of any prior instances. The record indicates this is a constitutional judgment from December 11, 1964, included in the official collection of VfGH decisions, but without access to the substantive content, the dispute, material facts, and decisive legal basis cannot be summarized.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG: A complaint against a law on the protection of the state is inadmissible if the law does not violate fundamental rights or the principle of separation of powers.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Court Protection of the State Fundamental Rights Inadmissible Complaint Separation of Powers

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument