Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
G22/64 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1964:G22.1964 KI-generiert

Constitutional court dismisses complaint regarding the validity of a specific administrative act under the 1964 Act on the Protection of the Constitution. The court finds no violation of fundamental rights. The complaint is rejected due to lack of admissibility. The court rules that the administrative act does not infringe upon constitutional guarantees. The decision upholds the legality of the contested measure. The court concludes that the act is fully compliant with the constitution.

Geschäftsnummer G22/64
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Österreich (AT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint against a specific administrative act, finding no violation of constitutional rights. The applicant argued that the measure infringed upon their protected interests, while the state contended the act was necessary for public order. The court rejected the claim because the challenged act did not violate any fundamental rights or constitutional principles.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG: The Constitutional Court dismisses complaints against administrative acts if no violation of fundamental rights or constitutional principles is established.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Court Administrative Act Fundamental Rights Constitutional Complaint Public Order Constitutional Review Admissibility

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument