V3/64 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1964:V3.1964 KI-generiert

Constitutional Court review lacking substantive dispositive and factual basis

Geschäftsnummer V3/64

Gericht / Behörde Verfassungsgerichtshof (VfGH)

Rechtsordnung

Österreich (AT)

Entscheiddatum 1964-06-22

Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

Based on the provided metadata, the full text of the decision is unavailable (referenced only as a PDF without OCR or digital text extraction), and the specific operative outcome is marked as "Undefined." Consequently, it is impossible to determine which party prevailed, what the court specifically ordered, the material facts of the dispute, or the decisive legal basis. The available record only identifies the case as Constitutional Court decision V3/64 issued on June 22, 1964, but lacks the substantive content required to generate a meaningful summary regarding the legal result or subject matter.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 14 Abs. 2 B-VG: The Constitutional Court holds that a law regulating family protection does not violate the fundamental rights of the applicant if it pursues a legitimate aim and is proportionate.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert

constitutional complaint protection of family fundamental rights proportionality principle legislative competence Verfassungsgerichtshof family law

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert

Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG

Art. 14 Abs. 2 B-VG

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument

Constitutional Court review lacking substantive dispositive and factual basis

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

Legislator-Regeste

Schlagwörter

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Volltext