Constitutional admissibility of challenging administrative disciplinary sanctions and fundamental rights violations in public service proceedings

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as inadmissible, leaving the lower court's decision in force; the applicant, a civil servant, challenged the disciplinary sanction imposed on them, arguing that the relevant procedural provisions violated their fundamental rights to a fair hearing and legal certainty. The Court determined that the statutory disciplinary regulations were compatible with the Federal Constitution and that the applicant failed to demonstrate that the specific application of these laws by the administrative authority had led to a violation of protected constitutional rights, thereby relying on established doctrine regarding the limited scope of constitutional review into factual findings and the permissibility of disciplinary measures under public service law.