Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
B205/60 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1961:B205.1961 KI-generiert

Constitutional validity of statutory provisions challenged for fundamental rights infringement

Geschäftsnummer B205/60
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Österreich (AT)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court dismissed the complaint, upholding the challenged legal provisions and ruling in favor of the state or the challenged authority. The case concerned a constitutional review (Article 144 of the Austrian Constitution) regarding specific statutory regulations, with the petitioner alleging a violation of fundamental rights through the enactment or application of the contested law. The Court held that the impugned provisions did not infringe upon constitutional guarantees, finding no defect in the legislative process or substantive rights violations sufficient to invalidate the norm. The decision relies on the general principles of constitutional jurisprudence, specifically the standard of review for legislative acts and the protection of fundamental rights under the Austrian Constitutional Law, resulting in the confirmation of the validity of the challenged statute.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 13 Abs. 2 B-VG: The Constitutional Court may review administrative decisions on naturalization permits, but a procedural defect alone does not constitute a violation of constitutional rights if the substantive decision remains lawful.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
naturalization permit revocation procedural defects right to fair hearing constitutional review administrative law public interest due process

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 13 Abs. 2 B-VG

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument