Constitutional review of the validity of a contested statutory provision
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Austrian Constitutional Court (VfGH) upheld the challenged provision, thereby dismissing the constitutional complaint and affirming the prevailing position of the opposing party or the legislature, as indicated by the 1960 decision B468/59. The dispute concerned the constitutionality of a specific legal norm, challenging its compatibility with the fundamental rights guarantees or the organizational rules of the Basic Law. The court’s decisive legal basis rested on its review powers under the Austrian Federal Constitutional Law, determining that the impugned measure did not infringe upon the complainant’s constitutional rights or procedural due process, thus maintaining the status quo of the contested legal provision.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 138a, Art. 138b of the Constitution: The Constitutional Court does not grant relief if the challenged administrative act does not infringe upon the protected constitutional rights or procedural guarantees specified in these articles.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVolltext
Siehe PDF-Dokument
Siehe PDF Dokument