Constitutional review of social security administrative determination and judicial interpretation of substantive social insurance law

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as unfounded, thereby upholding the decision of the lower administrative court and finding no violation of the complainant's fundamental rights. The case concerned a dispute over a social security or administrative matter (specifically related to benefits or contributions under social insurance law), where the applicant challenged the legality and constitutional validity of an administrative determination. The Court held that the acts of the administrative authorities and the relevant statutory provisions were in conformity with the Federal Constitution, as the administrative court had correctly interpreted and applied the substantive social security laws without infringing on the principle of equality or other protected rights. No specific legislative amendment or annulment was ordered; the existing legal framework and the challenged administrative decision were confirmed as valid.