Constitutional complaint against civil judgment: review of fact-finding discretion and limits of constitutional oversight

The Constitutional Court did not grant the constitutional complaint, leaving the lower instance decision in force. The case concerned a challenge to a civil court judgment, where the complainant argued that the trial court had violated their rights. The decisive legal basis was the review of the lower court's decision for compliance with the Constitution, specifically regarding the proper assessment of facts and application of law, which the Constitutional Court found to be within the discretion of the lower court and not a constitutional violation.