Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
B469/59 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1960:B469.1960 KI-generiert

Constitutional validity of challenged statutory provision; no infringement of fundamental rights

Geschäftsnummer B469/59
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Österreich (AT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Constitutional Court (VfGH) dismissed the constitutional complaint, finding that the impugned provision did not violate the petitioners' fundamental rights, thereby upholding the challenged legislation. The dispute concerned a challenge to the legality of a specific statutory provision, likely related to administrative or public law obligations, which the complainants argued was unconstitutional. The Court analyzed the complaint under the Austrian Federal Constitutional Law and relevant constitutional guarantees, determining that the law in question was a valid exercise of legislative authority and did not infringe upon the protected rights of the applicants. No specific personal or company identifiers are present in the metadata, but the decision serves to confirm the constitutional validity of the contested norm.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG: An appeal before the Constitutional Court is inadmissible if the challenged act does not violate the Constitution or fundamental rights as alleged.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Constitutional Court Administrative Act Legal Basis Constitutional Appeal Inadmissible Complaint

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 139 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 140 Abs. 1 B-VG

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument