Constitutional complaint challenging the validity of an administrative measure on fundamental rights grounds

The Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as unfounded. The dispute concerned a challenge to a specific administrative or legislative measure, where the petitioner argued that the underlying law violated fundamental rights or the constitution. The court determined that the contested provision did not infringe upon constitutional guarantees, thereby upholding the validity of the challenged legal norm. The decisive legal basis involved the standard of review for constitutional complaints, assessing whether the impugned statute complied with the constitutional order and protected individual rights; the court found no violation, rendering the complaint untenable and leaving the status quo ante in force.