Constitutional complaint challenging an administrative act: admissibility requirements for individual fundamental rights violation

The Austrian Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as inadmissible, meaning no prior decision was reversed and the challenged act remained in force. The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint against a specific administrative or legislative act, with the complainant challenging its validity under the Austrian Constitution. The court's decision was based on the procedural admissibility requirements for constitutional complaints, specifically the need to demonstrate a specific and individual violation of fundamental rights or constitutional guarantees by the challenged provision, which the court found was not sufficiently established or met the strict admissibility criteria for a review of the specific measure.